Battle Royale II: Requiem
Action • NR • 2003 • 2 hr 35 min
Directed By
Written By
User Reviews
Definitely not a great film but I personally enjoyed it pretty fun
Not a remake of the first one. Preferred the first one...
Pretty good, better than the first only because i found a dubbed version
How does one say "Hard No" in Japanese? Just watch the first one and leave it at that.
Interesting concepts executed poorly. First half hour is worth it, but I can’t speak for anything thereafter. Just stick with the first one.
I watched this because I saw the first one.
Such a disappointment after a great first movie. Nthing about this makes any sense anymore.
It follows the spirit of the original but lacks some of the nihilist charm Starting to lean to close to the hunger games political statement
As sequel to a true classic this film fails to deliver an engaging expirience. The plot's premise just isn't enough the carry a sequel.
A blatant rehash of the first one, that makes zero sense
Stats
Ratings
Attributes
Watch With
In the future, the Japanese government captures a class of ninth-grade students and forces them to kill each other under the revolutionary "Battle Royale" act.
It's three years after the events of the original Battle Royale, and Shuya Nanahara is now an internationally-known terrorist determined to bring down the government. His terrorist group, Wild Seven, stages an attack that levels several buildings in Tokyo on Christmas Day, killing 8000 people. In order for the government to study the benefits of "teamwork", the new students work in pairs, with their collars electronically linked so that if one of them is killed, the other dies as well. They must kill Nanahara in three days - or die.
